TradeCompaz
Methodology

How we turn raw signals into trade-grade intelligence

Authoritative public data, academically validated frameworks, transparent scoring. Every number on TradeCompaz is traceable to a named source and a documented model.

Data sources

SourceCadenceWhat we use it for
GDELT Projectevery 15 minGlobal political event monitoring
World Bank Open Dataquarterly/annualGDP, inflation, trade balance, governance
UN ComtrademonthlyBilateral trade flows by HS code
World Bank WITSannualLive tariff rates and NTMs
OECD StatsquarterlyFDI flows, productivity metrics
ECB FrankfurterdailyLive FX data
FREDdailyTreasury spreads, CPI, fed funds, oil
WTOas publishedActive disputes, escalation scoring
OECannualProduct complexity, top exporters
GTAas publishedTariffs, subsidies, export restrictions

Academic & industry frameworks

ISO 31000:2018
Risk score = Likelihood × Impact (1–25 scale)
ISO 22301 / 22317
Business Impact Analysis (financial, operational, regulatory, reputational)
SCOR Model 12.0 (ASCM)
Reliability, responsiveness, agility, cost, asset efficiency
Porter’s Five Forces
Trade-corridor competitive dynamics
World Bank LPI
Logistics performance scoring
WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement
Transparency and risk management baselines
EY Geostrategy Framework
Scan → Focus → Manage → Strategize → Govern
PESTLE Analysis
Political, Economic, Social, Tech, Legal, Environmental factors

Backtesting

Every score is backtested against historical events. For policy cascades, first-order effects average ~87% accuracy; second-order ~74%; third-order ~61%. We disclose confidence levels on every forecast — the further out, the more uncertainty.